After seven books of hearing only whispers and seeing only flashes of what happened the night Voldemort killed the Potters, marked Harry as his equal, and got this ball rolling, Chapter 17 finally gave us the long awaited scene in its entirety. Funny, but when I guessed what would happen in Deathly Hallows, I didn’t even consider that we’d get the opportunity to see how things unfolded that Halloween night, so it was a wonderful surprise to stumble upon it.
It was also a really difficult scene to get through. I will argue it was more difficult than Harry crying at his parents’ grave, and we’ve already said that one was a sucker punch right to the gut.
I read the account of Voldemort’s attack days ago, but I haven’t said anything until now. Instead, it’s been sort of sitting there, stewing. I really just haven’t been sure what to say, so I’ve covered other things in the meantime – Ron’s abandonment, the events in Godric’s Hollow, the Gryffindor Sword, Dumbledore’s rumored past, Harry’s broken wand.
Yet, I’ve found myself drawn to re-read this scene again and again. I think I’ve been through it three times now. It’s just…yeah…
So let’s do this, shall we?
Halloween. I never really thought about the fact that the Potters were killed on Halloween. I’d be quick to shrug this off as a bit cheesy, but I loved the way it was justified: Halloween, a holiday where Muggles dress-up as magical beings they don’t believe exist. To have that pop up this close to the end of the series is a wonderful tip-of-the-hat to the very first chapter of the very first book. It’s as if to say “Remember when none of this existed? Remember when it was just make-believe?”
Halloween also allows for Voldemort to wander the streets of Godric’s Hollow in full regalia. He seems like the type to hide in the shadows, but there’s no indication of that here. Oddly, this also affords us the interesting opportunity to see Voldemort display a bit of mercy. It’s a choice that shouldn’t surprise me as much as it does. Of course Voldemort has more than one side. Of course he is capable of mercy, even if he doesn’t exercise it. He’s not flat. He cannot possibly be 100% evil. That would instantly negate him as a believable villain. That said, I didn’t expect him to shrug off a Muggle child, though I can see where you can make the arguement that he didn’t spare him out of any sort of mercy; he spared him because there was no need to kill him. Perhaps Voldemort’s treatment of this kid (and Lily) doesn’t show the thin trace of humanity that remain, but the complete lack of it. He’s not being compassionate – he just can’t be bothered.
The Fidelius Charm was broken. Screw you, Pettigrew (mmm, rhyming is fun!). What’s sick about this moment is that the Potters had no idea. They weren’t even keeping their wands on them. Have we ever seen Harry without his wand? Isn’t constant vigilance key here? It was foolish of them and it shows how very young and optimistic they were in the end. I’m not casting blame here – it just gives a new dimension to a pair of characters who never quite made it into the series in earnest.
It wasn’t until the second reading that I really considered the perspective of this scene. We aren’t just watching this from Harry’s point-of-view. We are watching it through Harry’s eyes, through Voldemort’s eyes. Harry is embodying the wizard who kills his parents. He is attacking himself. It’s twisted and unnerving and would probably result in years of therapy if it happened in real life.
So here we have Harry watching his father play with his infant self, through the eyes and with the emotions of the man who is about to attack them. Does Harry even get the chance to feel for himself? Does the ass backward nature of this sink in at the time, or is that something he only gets to deal with afterward?
Okay, can I be honest for a second here? It’s kind of upsetting me to write this entry. I mean, I didn’t cry at this scene, but it’s just – yeah, I think this one ranks right up there with the Potters appearing out of Harry’s wand and Mrs. Weasley hugging him in Goblet of Fire. Some of these scenes are just harder than others.
Anyway…
You have to love James Potter for his one glorious moment of trying, in vain, to protect his family. “Lily, take Harry and go! It’s him! Go! Run! I’ll hold him off!” He didn’t even have his wand. For some reason, he reminded me a lot of Ron in this. The whole thing seemed like a very Ron thing to do – jump in front of the bullet, completely unprotected, to save the others. No real thought as to whether or not it would work. No real consideration of the consequences. Complete self-sacrafice. It’s a Ron thing.
An interesting thought (and we’ll deal with this sometime in another entry): An argument can be made that James Potter is very Ron-like and Lily Potter is very Hermione-like. Let that one sit for awhile.
So James Potter died because he didn’t have a wand. I mean, maybe he would have still died even if he did have a wand, but without it he didn’t stand a fighting chance.
And Harry doesn’t have a wand anymore.
A wizard is never more vulnerable than he is without his wand. It’s very clear in this scene: Wizards die without their wands.
Harry doesn’t have a wand, Harry doesn’t have a wand, Harry doesn’t have a wand…
…yeah, this is gonna be good!
James dies quickly – too quickly – and then we’re face-to-face with Lily, doing her best to block Harry.
“Not Harry, not Harry, please not Harry!”
“Stand aside, you silly girl…stand aside, now.”
“Not Harry, please no, take me, kill me instead -”
“This is my last warning -”
“Not Harry! Please…have mercy…have mercy…Not Harry! Not Harry! Please – I’ll do anything – “
Central to this story is Lily’s sacrifice, which takes awhile to comprehend. What do you mean Lily had a choice? Why would Voldemort kill James and be willing to spare Lily? This never made much sense to me. I get it now – I think.
James was killed because he stood in the way. Part of me read this as Voldemort seeing James as more of a threat, but I don’t really think there’s much merit in that. James was a barrier that had to be removed. Done and done. But Voldemort saw Lily differently. She could be frightened out of the way. She could be physically moved. There was no real need to kill her, so why bother? If she would just step aside…
Of course she wasn’t going to step aside. You find me a mother that would step aside. But it’s not like I imagined it. Voldemort didn’t tell her to move and then kill her. He offered her the chance to escape three times and three times she refused – once, when he walked in the room, once when he warned her the first time, and once when he gave her the final warning. For those of you who enjoy the significance of the number 7 in this series, I’m going to let you chew over Lily’s insistence to spare Harry repeated 3 times. A message repeated 3 times without wavering is often used to drive a point home – to show complete adherence to what is being said. I bet you can find another example of this pretty easily. Biblical reference time! See what you can come up with.
Harry didn’t cry.
I mentioned this back when Cedric was abruptly escorted out of existence: the Avada Kedavra is not a violent death. In fact, it’s startling in its lack of violence. James’ death is described as a marionette puppet having its strings cut. The ease of this sort of murder is what makes it so frightening. Murder should leave traces. It should create something worthy of its weight. A bloody death says “Something happened here”. The Avada Kedavra simply pushes the furniture around a little and creates a momentary light show. Of course a baby wouldn’t cry. You can hardly tell anything happened at all.
Which is why it was so shocking to see the utter destruction that resulted from Voldemort’s attack on Harry. This time, the Avada Kedavra backfired and blew up the house!
What’s been sitting in my mind is that Voldemort aimed the spell directly at Harry’s forehead. He looked Harry in the eye and Harry looked at him right back. Can you see defiance in an infant’s eyes? In this moment, did Harry look into his own defiant eyes and see the challenge that seemed to say “Go ahead, try”?
As Voldemort shoots an Avada Kedavra out the window at Harry and sees him vanish, unscathed, do you think he sees that defiance all over again?
Why won’t this child die?
This is, by far, one of my favorite scenes in the series.
























